<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pipe classic, Pipe lite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gertismedia.com/blog/2006/11/11/pipe-classic-pipe-lite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gertismedia.com/blog/2006/11/11/pipe-classic-pipe-lite/</link>
	<description>on digital</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bertram</title>
		<link>http://www.gertismedia.com/blog/2006/11/11/pipe-classic-pipe-lite/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 09:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gertismedia.com/blog/2006/11/11/pipe-classic-pipe-lite/#comment-511</guid>
		<description>Some thoughts about media brands:
- they don't extend very well into social media. Would you create a profile on foxspace? (#1 reason why Focus live has no traction is the focus brand)
- the brands are too big. What do you get when you look at RTL branded content? Outside their pipes this branding is worth nothing. 
- The brands are much smaller now: GÃ¼nther Jauch, DSDS or CSI. 
- If they lose their pipe they lose their brand. 
Time to split things up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some thoughts about media brands:<br />
- they don&#8217;t extend very well into social media. Would you create a profile on foxspace? (#1 reason why Focus live has no traction is the focus brand)<br />
- the brands are too big. What do you get when you look at RTL branded content? Outside their pipes this branding is worth nothing.<br />
- The brands are much smaller now: GÃ¼nther Jauch, DSDS or CSI.<br />
- If they lose their pipe they lose their brand.<br />
Time to split things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
